On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:34:51PM -0700, Zoltan Frombach wrote: > >Yes. Wouldn't it be a nice feature for "portupgrade -P" to install the > >port instead of the package if any non-defaults were defined in > >pkgtools.conf? > > If you really want to add this to portupgrade, it should be optional, > though. Because someone might have a broken compiler or something and just > wants to install a binary package quickly. In that case it should be > possible to force a binary package installation regardless of what's inside > the pkgtools.conf file. Don't you agree? 'portupgrade -PP' can still be used for that. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)Received on Wed Oct 27 2004 - 19:15:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:19 UTC