Re: EHCI considered harmful?

From: Bruce M Simpson <bms_at_spc.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:08:17 -0700

On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Thomas E. Zander wrote:
> I'm just wondering why ehci doesn't make it into GENERIC for RELENG_5.
> Are there unresolved show stoppers related to it?

ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based
USB2 disk enclosure.

BMS

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Fri Oct 29 2004 - 06:08:30 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rogier R. Mulhuijzen: "Re: [PATCH] added WEP authmode shared to NDISulator"
Previous message: Thomas E. Zander: "EHCI considered harmful?"
In reply to: Thomas E. Zander: "EHCI considered harmful?"
Next in thread: Thomas E. Zander: "Re: EHCI considered harmful?"
Reply: Thomas E. Zander: "Re: EHCI considered harmful?"
Reply: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: EHCI considered harmful?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC