Re: EHCI considered harmful?

From: Thomas E. Zander <riggs_at_rrr.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:19:00 +0200
Hi,

On Fri, 29. Oct 2004, at  1:08 -0700, Bruce M Simpson wrote
according to [Re: EHCI considered harmful?]:

> ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based
> USB2 disk enclosure.

Well, okay then. I was just wondering because it doesn't appear on
Scott's todo-list for 5.3-R and it seems to accidently work on my
box :-)

Thanks,
Riggs

-- 
- "[...] I talked to the computer at great length and
-- explained my view of the Universe to it" said Marvin.
--- And what happened?" pressed Ford.
---- "It committed suicide." said Marvin.

Received on Fri Oct 29 2004 - 06:19:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC