Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Wednesday 31 August 2005 22:19, Eric Anderson wrote: > >>>Although last time I saw this discussed I came away with the impression >>>that it wasn't possible for the kernel to do this..? (without substantial >>>work anyway) >> >>Why not just use the automounter to mount/umount this for you? This >>probably won't get around umounting while in use, but you might be able >>to tell amd to use a umount -f on it. > > > I would have thought you'd still get a panic anyway..? > The VM will try and flush the dirty pages when you umount and consequently > panic. My thinking was that amd would auto-unmount the filesystem when it isn't being used, and if the timeout is set low (I think the default is 5 minutes), then once done using the flash, it would have time to umount before it was unplugged. Now that I think about it though, if he is using it (and open files), it won't even attempt to unmount it anyhow. This is where I think it would be great to have a sort of 'flashfs' - something like a UFS2 filesystem, but read only until a write happens, and all writes would be synchronous, and after the write occurs, the fs goes back to a 'read only' state. Maybe this could be done with gjournal or even unionfs - mount the usb flash read only, do all writes to a memory backed disk, and then flush the writes out to the usb flash periodically. Not perfect, but maybe this will stir some ideas up. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed Aug 31 2005 - 11:13:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:42 UTC