On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > devd won't be rewritten to not use C++. That's a non-option. > : > : Out of curiosity, why is that? I have nothing against C++, but that > : stance seems surprising. I have not scanned the tree, but I was under > : the impression that very little of the base system that is written in C++. > > Because I wrote it, and I don't like stupid reasons to dictate a choice > of language. It will remain C++ because I'm a grumpy old man, ... At last, he admits the truth. :-) Robert N M WatsonReceived on Tue Jun 21 2005 - 09:01:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC