Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

From: Danny Braniss <danny_at_cs.huji.ac.il>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:11:58 +0200
> Daichi GOTO wrote:
> > All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions
> > and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :)
> 
> OK.  How about a merge?
> 
> I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jan Mikkelsen.

just a 'me too'. I've been running with the patch(under 6.1) and it's 
definitely
better than the panics with the unpatched version. in other words,
IMHO, it does not break anything, and it actualy fixes somethings.

danny
Received on Fri Mar 17 2006 - 08:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:53 UTC