Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

From: Jacques Marneweck <jacques_at_powertrip.co.za>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:30:02 +0200
Danny Braniss wrote:
>> Daichi GOTO wrote:
>>     
>>> All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions
>>> and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :)
>>>       
>> OK.  How about a merge?
>>
>> I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jan Mikkelsen.
>>     
>
> just a 'me too'. I've been running with the patch(under 6.1) and it's 
> definitely
> better than the panics with the unpatched version. in other words,
> IMHO, it does not break anything, and it actualy fixes somethings.
>
> danny
>   
Any ETA to when we can see this merged into 6.1 and 5.5?

Regards
--jm

-- 
Jacques Marneweck
http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Received on Fri Mar 17 2006 - 08:30:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:53 UTC