Jacques Marneweck ha scritto: > Danny Braniss wrote: >>> Daichi GOTO wrote: >>> >>>> All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions >>>> and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :) >>>> >>> OK. How about a merge? >>> >>> I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Jan Mikkelsen. >>> >> just a 'me too'. I've been running with the patch(under 6.1) and it's >> definitely >> better than the panics with the unpatched version. in other words, >> IMHO, it does not break anything, and it actualy fixes somethings. >> >> danny >> > Any ETA to when we can see this merged into 6.1 and 5.5? This patchset doesn't apply in 5.x branch. The unionfs code of 5.x is different and afaik is working quite well (we used it on freesbie 1.1 without problems). Cheers, -- Dario Freni (saturnero_at_freesbie.org) FreeSBIE developer (http://www.freesbie.org) GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:53 UTC