Re: RAIDframe

On 24/5/06 18:02, "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah_at_freebsd.org> wrote:

> [Adding www_at_ to CC because this thread reveals a Web site bug.]
> 
> If memory serves me right, patrik wrote:
>> Scott Long skrev:
>>> patrik wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Today I read through
>>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-current&m=107377398125007&w=2
>>>> I am I right i think this was the result?
>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-March/020551.html
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway, when looking on
>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=raid&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0
>>>> -current&apropos=1&format=html
>>>> 
>>>> it seems that RAIDframe is back, in -current. Is it? Or has it always
>>>> been there? Is it working? Haven't found any information about the
>>>> subject on the lists since it was removed.
>> 
>> What's going on with RAIDframe?
>> What does this menas?
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=raid&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-current
> 
> It means that for some reason, the version of the CURRENT manpages on
> the Web site didn't track the removal of the raid(4) manpage.  See here:
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/man/man4/Attic/raid.4
> 
> This is a Web site glitch, nothing more.  :-p

Actually, it probably just means that sledge still has an old raid(4) manual
on it, since that is where I got the CURRENT manpages from the last time I
did the update.

ceri
-- 
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                      -- Moliere