On 9/12/06, Graham Todd <gtodd_at_bellanet.org> wrote: > Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:44:49PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > >> Is this as a consequence of the manufacturers paranoia that open-source > >> developers won't comply with wifi regulatory requirements (i.e. channel > >> and power restrictions by country) or some other reason? (not that you > >> can't just plug in any other card into the pcmcia slot ..), > > > > It's not manufacturers paranoia - it a requirement from the FCC (among > > others) that radio control must not take place in user-accessible > > software. > > How does the FCC define a "user" I wonder? Pretty much "not the manufacturer." > Is there a difference > between the "user" of software installed on a laptop and the user of the > included hardware and radio equipment that develops said software. If you're not the manufacturer of the "device", the laptop in this case, you are a user. When the manus sold laptops with slots and let you pick your wireless card, the wireless card was the device and YOU were responsible for an interference caused. > It seems like an engineer to engineer sort of matter that might require > lawyer to lawyer interaction :-\ Reading FCC regulations IS part of engineering, out there in the big bad REAL world. It's important not to confuse "software" with "engineering." ;^) -- Against stupidity the very gods Themselves contend in vain. Friedrich SchillerReceived on Wed Sep 13 2006 - 23:09:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC