Re: [PATCH] linux_statfs64() missing an argument??

On Sun, 08 Apr 2007, Rink Springer wrote:
> Hi David,
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:10:13PM +0100, David Taylor wrote:
> > I'm currently recompiling my kernel to test this, but thought I'd see
> > if anyone had any comments on the patch as is, since I've probably done
> > something wrong, as I'm not too sure how the whole syscalls.master setup
> > works.

I have now tested this, and it compiles and works correctly (at least,
statfs returns success, thus satisying autoconf, I'll find out shortly
if df displays the right values).
 
> Looks good to me. However, as you might have seen, some files are
> flagged "Do not edit". I believe editing a syscalls.master file will
> automatically invoke a rebuild of these files, and thus, they need not
> be part of your patch.
> 
> Have you tried whether the appropriate files are automatically
> regenerated?

I wasn't too sure whether to include the diffs for those files (which
did automatically regenerate), but since they exist in CVS, I decided
to keep them.

-- 
David Taylor