On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 08:04:55AM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote: > On 02/12/07 02:42, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > >Eric Anderson wrote: > >>>Is the problem with the way the ports collection detects the existence > >>>of dependencies or with the way the dependencies are installed? > >>I'm guessing it's the removal of objformat from the tree. You can try > >>to grab the pre-removal version, and compile/install it. This helped me > >>build my ports again. Painful. > > > >Hmm. That would be it. Seems like it's been threatened for a long time. > > > >---------------------------- > >revision 1.19 > >date: 2007/01/25 22:26:41; author: peter; state: dead; lines: +1 -1 > >Retire objformat(1) as threatened in 2002. > > > >Ian > > > Yep. I'm no ports guru, but seems like prior to whacking this, a quick > burn through the ports should have been done. Not sure if it's > happening now or not, but I just put objformat back to move on.. See the email I sent to ports the other week. Also make sure your ports tree is up-to-date, yours looks like it's not. kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:05 UTC