On 02/12/07 08:38, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 08:04:55AM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote: >> On 02/12/07 02:42, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >>> Eric Anderson wrote: >>>>> Is the problem with the way the ports collection detects the existence >>>>> of dependencies or with the way the dependencies are installed? >>>> I'm guessing it's the removal of objformat from the tree. You can try >>>> to grab the pre-removal version, and compile/install it. This helped me >>>> build my ports again. Painful. >>> Hmm. That would be it. Seems like it's been threatened for a long time. >>> >>> ---------------------------- >>> revision 1.19 >>> date: 2007/01/25 22:26:41; author: peter; state: dead; lines: +1 -1 >>> Retire objformat(1) as threatened in 2002. >>> >>> Ian >> >> Yep. I'm no ports guru, but seems like prior to whacking this, a quick >> burn through the ports should have been done. Not sure if it's >> happening now or not, but I just put objformat back to move on.. > > See the email I sent to ports the other week. Also make sure your > ports tree is up-to-date, yours looks like it's not. Well, I hit the problem before your email went out (a cc: to -current would have been good too, btw - unless I just missed it), and my ports are currently just 4 days old. Updating again now. Thanks for working hard to get rid of the objformat snafus.. EricReceived on Mon Feb 12 2007 - 13:59:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:05 UTC