Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:13:35 -0400
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:11:53PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Scott Long <scottl_at_samsco.org> writes:
> > The tinderboxes have stricter compile flags than the normal buildworld
> > environment.  The hope is that we'll be able to go to -O2 as the default
> > optimization someday, which requires the stricter flags.  I think what
> > you're missing here is the -fstrict-aliasing flag.
> 
> No, the tinderbox just uses -O2 (which implies -fno-strict-aliasing).

No, it implies -fstrict-aliasing, which is why the tinderbox often
breaks on code that was tested 100% correctly by the committer prior
to running with your nonstandard flags ;)

Kris
Received on Wed Mar 28 2007 - 16:13:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:07 UTC