On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 03:54:37PM +0200, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > On Saturday 26 May 2007 15:15:34 Ivan Voras wrote: > > Roman Divacky wrote: > > > well.. I dont think that 60% increase of size when you are optimizing for > > > size is normal. I even think its a "bug" in that sense that something > > > wrong is set somewhere which causes this. > > > > > > I certainly dont believe this is normal > > > > I'm using the default make flags. In my case, it's release, > > non-debugging 6-RELEASE kernel of 26 MB vs debugging kernel of 7-CURRENT > > of 106 MB :) > > I guess that's due to /boot/kernel/*.symbols which are not present in my 6.2 > installation. gcc42 file size increase shouldn't be that much. thats the problem. with -Os and gcc42 the kernel increases A LOT (60%), other optimization levels doesnt seem to be affectedReceived on Sat May 26 2007 - 12:04:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC