Mark Powell wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > > Intel CPU Pentium DualCore E2140 > > They are similar price to the cheapest AMD and are really just a > Core2Duo with just 1MB cache and offical 800MHz FSB. However, they are > the same silicon as C2D. As such these run easily at ~3GHz with > 350-400MHz FSB all with no voltage increases, if you're into such things. > It's a shame AMD have fallen behind Intel. Corporate crime does pay > it seems :( Personally I don't see any evidence about this statement in low price solution. I use AMD for a long time and it has never as overclockable as Intel. The first one I have found is A64 3000 which I bought two weeks ago... > >> >> Though Core 2 Duo CPUs are more expensive, > > See above. Possibly not as low power as an AMD solution, but a lot > more for your money, me thinks. I think overclocking shoudn't be understood as a feature you pay for. It's mainly a matter of luck. Reliability (probability of crash) and lifetime of such machines could be worse. KarelReceived on Wed Oct 24 2007 - 09:20:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:20 UTC