Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi sobomax! > > On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:03:42 -0800 > Maxim Sobolev <sobomax_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> Roman Divacky wrote: >>> I believe other OSes should be able to do the porting effort when they >>> want to use FreeBSD software. >>> if kqueue-in-script makes any improvement go for it. >> I really doubt there would be any. It's just 2 descriptors, and if >> select(2) can't handle 2 descriptors efficiently them perhaps it is >> broken and has to be fixed instead. > > I think that performance improvement is significant(I don't > think performance improved by my patch). But my patch is the And can you explain where that "significant improvement" comes from? Are you saying that tty layer / pseudo-terminal driver is somehow much more efficient with kqeue(2) compared to select(2)/poll(2)? There is something broken about it if so. In any case without any numbers this discussion is pretty much pointless. -MaximReceived on Mon Dec 22 2008 - 19:58:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:39 UTC