Re: MPSAFE TTY schedule [uart vs sio]

From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt_at_mac.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:42:35 -0700
On Jul 4, 2008, at 5:35 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> : I looked into it in 2003 but since I don't have any hardware,
> : I wasn't the one able to do it. I think the fundamental problem
> : is that the BRG is not part of the UART itself and needs a
> : separate handle or even (tag, handle) pair to access. That's as
> : far as I know the only big thing about the work.
> :
> : For me not having access to the hardware is a showstopper for
> : looking into it myself.
>
> Do you need physical access?

No, not at all. As long as the USART is connected to another
UART that I can access and as long as I can load/unload the
uart(4) module, I should be able to write the support for
it.

Even only restricted sudo(1) should be fine.

>  I have a pc98 machine I can put back on
> the network.  It has the 8251 chip in it.  It also has a 16550 part as
> well since it is a later model which had both...

Perfect. A null-modem cable between the two of them and I
should be all set.

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt_at_mac.com
Received on Fri Jul 04 2008 - 17:42:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:32 UTC