Re: HEADS UP: Major CAM performance regression

This is also the case with 7.0-RELEASE on areca. We have a machine here
which literally grinds to a half every time we run our rrd updates, so
may be a good test case here if we can fix that ;-)

    Regards
    Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Tancsa" <mike_at_sentex.net>
To: "Scott Long" <scottl_at_samsco.org>; "FreeBSD Current" <freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org>; "FreeBSD Stable" 
<freebsd-stable_at_freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Major CAM performance regression


> At 05:55 AM 2/13/2009, Scott Long wrote:
>
>>If, instead, it reports a value of '1', you are likely affected.  Note
>>that it may be normal for USB memory devices to report a low number.
>>Also, many legacy SCSI disks, and devices that are not disks, may also be expected to report a low number.
>
> Hi Scott,
>         I tested with the patch on my areca controller, and it still reports 1 post patch.  (On RELENG_6, it shows 255 with the 
> same controller)
>
>         ---Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> 


================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster_at_multiplay.co.uk.