On 7 April 2010 18:33, Dan Nelson <dnelson_at_allantgroup.com> wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 07), krad said: > > On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash <fjwcash_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy <lhmwzy_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > > What's your mean?? > > > > > > See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two > > > separate groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD 9-CURRENT. > > > And there's work ongoing to get ZFSv15 added to FreeBSD 8-STABLE. > > > > > > IOW, just be patient. Good things will come to those who wait. ;) > > > > If you re hankering for dedup you better have a big box as its a complete > > resource hog. From what we have seen on our x4500 filers we need about > > 100gig of ram or l2arc ssd to hold the all the metadata for the 34TB of > > storage, otherwise the system grinds to a halt. > > I wish they had an option for "opportunistic" dedup, where if a block is > already in ARC it can be a dedupe candidate, but it won't look it up in the > DDT if it isn't already in memory. That catches the simple "cp -R dir1 > dir2" cases without blowing up the ARC on DDT blocks that 99.9999% of the > time don't match. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson_at_allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > ZFS is still currently in heavy development so it might happen. Having siad that it looks like oracle have totally buggered it up for everyone with their retroactive licenses. I hope the CDL was tight enough that stuff wont have to get pulled from freebsdReceived on Thu Apr 08 2010 - 06:46:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC