On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Gustau P??rez wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit: > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote: > >>> Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to > >>> read and work email and wireless stuffs. > >>> > >>> Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in > >>> CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP. > >>> > >> The patch made the machine to panic. I think it happened when launching > >> the supplicant. In fact, right now it works by putting the RF switch to > >> OFF. As soon as I change it to ON the machine panics. > >> > >> It get a trap 12, with two reasons : page fault and "bufwrite, buffer is > >> not busy?" > >> > >> I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision). > >> > >> Do you want me to test anything else ? > > > > OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached > > patch? > > > > regards, > > Weongyo Jeong > > > I've just updated to FreeBSD 8.1 PRERELEASE and I see the > unsupported rate problem again. I applied the patch for CURRENT and it > works. So I guess the patch was not MFC in the 8.1 branch. It's MFCed today. > However it still works slow (betwenn 200 and 300 kbytes/s). I tried > using a rum dongle with the same AP (which is a 8.0-STABLE system with > an Atheros card) and works great when uploading (2Mb sustained). Umm. I have no clue why this is happened currently. When I found any hints I'll let you know. Thank you. > In my laptop I see now messages like these : > > bwn0: RX decryption attempted (old 0 keyidx 0x1) You could ignore this messages because bwn(4) doesn't support H/W crypto and it looks it's harmless. > If you want me to try anything, let me know. Regards, Weongyo JeongReceived on Mon May 24 2010 - 19:09:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC