Re: [RFC] More meaningful information about ENOEXEC for kldload(8)

From: Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:06:44 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 10/25/10 14:15, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 13:33, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> (except if the message is changed to say "please look at the kernel
>> syslog messages to find out the real reason for this failure")
> 
> Thinking about Garrett's response as well, this may be the best way to
> go. At this point I'm also not concerned about waiting for an ideal
> solution. IMO an incremental change here would be most welcome.

I'm thinking about the attached patch which turns printf(9) to
uprintf(9) call.

Cheers,
- -- 
Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net>	http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!	       Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMximkAAoJEATO+BI/yjfB5ZcH/2Z3UxQmPcRb1YL/+y4imUne
jrfLwSXABUcN48w77M1a8qhb0leKrQDzkZxM4Q9+0m/0Y18TA5EYBEIyuVebuVoM
+YcfbTI2CH8UAFPUY/su6WNAUHEFQy4tfx4dAeTgOWecVkcoKGGbI6p0V1NCAYUS
WRg6VeC7Tv8HySemQHzkKyBFHB6zKWy4U95FDDltiZlzQ5Vv+VquSOURZFw2O7F6
qlvO6B4F1EAbwfibRh5ihKbc1F4uqYrGmidgeH0MfarGsjBXoffmrB7Z+N5409+s
d843bw/zR0rgnYkGuE6WNXnChYQvLb6Mgzrg10yDRVhxamUOzq4PHuL5iZ8DBEM=
=t2jW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Mon Oct 25 2010 - 23:07:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:08 UTC