On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > This website should be brushed up or taken offline! > > It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html > > I think this one would better look like list of major features with os > comparison, like: > > = Networking = > * IPv6: major support, best stack around. > * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. > ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet). > > = Data storage = > * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux > has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has > dynamic disks since XP (?features). > > = SMP = > * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some > rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like > DragonflyBSD and QNX). > And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems which those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention. --HPSReceived on Tue Aug 30 2011 - 05:32:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC