On 08/30/2011 05:21 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 08/30/11 12:31, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: >> On 08/30/2011 12:59 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> But I also express my opinion that updating such a document should be >> done by a third party. > I slightly disagree with that. No problem > Who else than the developer/core team > members know better about what's > in and what's not in the FreeBSD box? So, for a features listing, it's OK. I really agree on turning it into a feature list. For a _comparison_, I think it's up to somewhere else: To really compare, it's mandatory to really now the multiple compared items. Who cares about the latest MS Windows internals (deep networking capability, filesystem tricks, kernel scheduler specs,...) in here? I migh be wrong, but IMHO "core devs" and "power users" wont spend time to deeply investigate on the other systems. Again, just an opinion. -- RMA.Received on Tue Aug 30 2011 - 12:31:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC