On 12/3/2011 1:21 AM, Roman Kurakin wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> [...] The fact that we have so many people who are radically >> change-averse, no matter how rational the change; is a bug, not a >> feature. >> >> This particular bug is complicated dramatically by the fact that >> the majority view seems to lean heavily towards "If I use it, it >> must be the default and/or in the base" rather than seeing ports as >> part of the overall operating SYSTEM. >> > You are right in general, except one small factor. We are talking > about bootstrap. You realize that you just 100% demonstrated the truth of what I wrote above, right? :) > CVS is used by many as the one of the ways to get > the sources to the freshly installed system to recompile to the last > available source. It will become inconvenient to do it through the > process of installing some ports for that. Especially if > corresponding ports would require some other ports as dependences. I want to ask some serious questions here, because I genuinely want to understand your thought process. 1. Do you install *any* ports/packages on a new system before you update the source? 2. If so, why is installing one more unthinkable? 3. Why is it a problem if the port/package you need to install in the early stages has dependencies? Thanks, Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/Received on Sat Dec 03 2011 - 23:25:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC