Re: [CFR]RT305xF support, w/o attachment

From: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray_at_ddteam.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:16:01 +0200
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:59:45 +0800
Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 21 March 2011 04:28, Sergey V. Dyatko <sergey.dyatko_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Last patch from Aleksandr 'works fine for me', so... may be rt2860
> > should be replaced to 'rt' for example ?
> > rt0: flags= blah-blah-blah IHMO looks more .....nice(?) than
> > rt28600: flags=
> >
> 
> Yup, that's a good idea. Aleksandr, can you please do that?

Off-course I can, but seems better name will be rtw or rtn, because we
already have if_rt (for RT3052 ether) which have iface name "rt".

I think "rtn" is best. 

Maybe someone have better? 


> 
> 
> Adrian


-- 
Aleksandr Rybalko <ray_at_ddteam.net>
Received on Sun Mar 20 2011 - 22:16:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC