On Monday 21 March 2011 00:16:01 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:59:45 +0800 > Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On 21 March 2011 04:28, Sergey V. Dyatko <sergey.dyatko_at_gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Last patch from Aleksandr 'works fine for me', so... may be rt2860 > > > should be replaced to 'rt' for example ? > > > rt0: flags= blah-blah-blah IHMO looks more .....nice(?) than > > > rt28600: flags= > > > > > > > Yup, that's a good idea. Aleksandr, can you please do that? > > Off-course I can, but seems better name will be rtw or rtn, because we > already have if_rt (for RT3052 ether) which have iface name "rt". > > I think "rtn" is best. > > Maybe someone have better? rtw is a name for a Realtek driver. I'd prefer if can keep this driver in sync with the OpenBSD one where it is clearly derived from. So, rt28xx and rt30xx support has to be an extension to ral(4). That shouldn't be to hard to do, just throw in the code into dev/ral/ and hook it to the pci/ops code. -- BernhardReceived on Mon Mar 21 2011 - 05:09:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC