Hi, On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:04:22 +0100 Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Monday 21 March 2011 00:16:01 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: >> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:59:45 +0800 >> > Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> > >> > > On 21 March 2011 04:28, Sergey V. Dyatko <sergey.dyatko_at_gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > > Last patch from Aleksandr 'works fine for me', so... may be rt2860 >> > > > should be replaced to 'rt' for example ? >> > > > rt0: flags= blah-blah-blah IHMO looks more .....nice(?) than >> > > > rt28600: flags= >> > > > >> > > >> > > Yup, that's a good idea. Aleksandr, can you please do that? >> > >> > Off-course I can, but seems better name will be rtw or rtn, because we >> > already have if_rt (for RT3052 ether) which have iface name "rt". >> > >> > I think "rtn" is best. >> > >> > Maybe someone have better? >> >> rtw is a name for a Realtek driver. Realtek driver called urtw, but I agree with you to avoid confusion. >> >> I'd prefer if can keep this driver in sync with the OpenBSD one where >> it is clearly derived from. So, rt28xx and rt30xx support has to be an >> extension to ral(4). That shouldn't be to hard to do, just throw in the >> code into dev/ral/ and hook it to the pci/ops code. This driver closer to USB run(4), but this use USB and difference still big. In future, not so closer, I will try to join run, ral and my rt2860. But there is too much work and I need to find time for it. >> >> -- >> Bernhard So for now, best name is "rtn". If no objections, I send updated patch with new name. Thank you Bernhard! WBW -- Alexandr Rybalko <ray_at_dlink.ua> aka Alex RAY <ray_at_ddteam.net>Received on Mon Mar 21 2011 - 08:29:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC