On 10/10/11 21:04, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100 > Chris Rees <utisoft_at_gmail.com> mentioned: > >> Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed >> something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it. >> >> Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its >> location? >> >> This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We're >> going to end up being asked to support it on ports_at_ otherwise. >> > You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portmgr_at_ > descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk. Go find > some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever. You might want > to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them anymore > (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working ports > tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations). > Hello? Is there need for this barbarian rude tone? Regards, ohReceived on Mon Oct 10 2011 - 18:33:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC