On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100 Chris Rees <utisoft_at_gmail.com> mentioned: > > Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed > something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it. > > Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its > location? > > This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We're > going to end up being asked to support it on ports_at_ otherwise. > You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portmgr_at_ descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk. Go find some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever. You might want to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them anymore (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working ports tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations). -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachmentsReceived on Mon Oct 10 2011 - 17:05:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC