On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:04:19 -0700 Stanislav Sedov <stas_at_FreeBSD.org> mentioned: > On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100 > Chris Rees <utisoft_at_gmail.com> mentioned: > > > > > Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed > > something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it. > > > > Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its > > location? > > > > This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We're > > going to end up being asked to support it on ports_at_ otherwise. > > > > You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portmgr_at_ > descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk. Go find > some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever. You might want > to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them anymore > (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working ports > tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations). > Quoting myself. Sorry to all if this sounded rude, I might have overreacted. I didn't meant to be personal, it's just the whole situation is disappointing. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachmentsReceived on Mon Oct 10 2011 - 20:57:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC