On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Hartmann, O. <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 10/10/11 21:04, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100 >> Chris Rees <utisoft_at_gmail.com> mentioned: >> >>> Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed >>> something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it. >>> >>> Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its >>> location? >>> >>> This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We're >>> going to end up being asked to support it on ports_at_ otherwise. >>> >> You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portmgr_at_ >> descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk. Go find >> some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever. You might want >> to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them anymore >> (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working ports >> tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations). >> > Hello? Is there need for this barbarian rude tone? Can everyone calm down a little bit, step back and think twice before making reactions? Stop it, as this hurts the project as a family. Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or dieReceived on Mon Oct 10 2011 - 20:41:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC