Oliver Fromme wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, the periodic/weekly/400.status-pkg script uses > the ports' INDEX file if it exists. On my machines, the > INDEX file exists, and the periodic script produces output > like this: > > $ /etc/periodic/weekly/400.status-pkg > > Check for out of date packages: > $ > > That is, apparently everything is up to date, so I don't > have to do anything. But this is wrong. When I change it > to use /nonexistent in place of the INDEX file, I get this > output: > > $ /etc/periodic/weekly/400.status-pkg > > Check for out of date packages: > netpbm-manpages-10.35.85 was orphaned: LOCAL/netpbm-manpages > pkg-config-0.25_1 was orphaned: devel/pkg-config > $ > > A-ha! The first line is to be expected (netpbm-manpages > is a "fake" port that I maintain locally), but the second > line about pkg-config is much more important. Now this > makes me look at ports/UPDATING, revealing that pkg-config > was replaced by pkgconf. > > Therefore I propose to change the default for the periodic > script to use /nonexistent. It does not change the output > that usually appears, it only produces _additional_ output > for installed packages whose origin disappeared. This is > valuable information, I think. Also, the INDEX file could > be outdated, which might lead to wrong results, so using > the INDEX file by default is probably not a good idea anyway. On the other hand - we are using daily `portsnap -I update` so we have updated INDEX on all our machines, but outdated ports tree. (freezed in some point in time, so we can have same versions installed on all servers in a group) I think it should be user configurable in /etc/periodic.conf if somebody want to use INDEX or not. Or the hack with /nonexistent should be mentioned in a comment in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf and in a manpage. Miroslav LachmanReceived on Fri Jul 27 2012 - 07:13:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:29 UTC