GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

From: Boris Samorodov <bsam_at_passap.ru>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:02:18 +0400
23.08.2013 13:16, David Chisnall пишет:

> I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on platforms where clang is the system compiler.  We definitely don't want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these for the lifetime of the 10.x branch.  

Isn't it a POLA violation?

As for me I expect something like this:
. 9.x gcc default and clang in base;
. 10.x clang default and gcc in base;
. 11.x gcc withdraw.

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Received on Fri Aug 23 2013 - 09:02:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC