Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:02:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 23.08.2013 13:16, David Chisnall ??????????:
> 
>> I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code
>> slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build
>> on platforms where clang is the system compiler.  We definitely
>> don't want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these
>> for the lifetime of the 10.x branch.  
> 
> Isn't it a POLA violation?
> 
> As for me I expect something like this:
> . 9.x gcc default and clang in base;
> . 10.x clang default and gcc in base;
> . 11.x gcc withdraw.
> 

+1

-- 
Steve