Yasir hussan wrote: > Thanks for notic but all the elebration was for make alias on one > interface but i want to have multiple interface, i can no where that > some one would have tring to creating new interfaces and using them, > or may be i am missing something, just send its solution if have, > solution should be for I still think you're confusing Linux semantics with FreeBSD semantics. On linux you would have: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:C9:53:0B:61 inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21e:c9ff:fe53:b61/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:211328068 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:368394006 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:34065846811 (31.7 GiB) TX bytes:476377525764 (443.6 GiB) Interrupt:169 Memory:e6000000-e6011100 eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:C9:53:0B:61 inet addr:10.0.1.1 Bcast:10.0.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:169 Memory:e6000000-e6011100 On FreeBSD you would have: re0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8209b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE> ether 54:04:a6:96:0c:1e inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255 inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>) status: active These are both the same thing. Is there any particular reason that you want multiple interfaces? I can't see a use for it beyond "it's what I'm used to seeing" unless they're VLAN interfaces. Ian -- Ian FreislichReceived on Tue Mar 12 2013 - 11:12:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:35 UTC