On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:49:14PM -0400, drosih_at_rpi.edu wrote: d> As far as the kernel-level support, I assume you're just removing all d> the code tied to the kernel options NETATALK and NETATALKDEBUG? Or does d> it entail some other changes, which might wreck my custom compile of CAP? Yes, that is the plan. If remove of NETATALK hurts your build, we can work this out. Either leave some header in system, or move it into your custom build. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.Received on Mon Oct 28 2013 - 15:58:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:43 UTC