On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:06:44 -0700 "David O'Brien" <obrien_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:14:30PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:24:45 -0700 John-Mark Gurney > > <jmg_at_funkthat.com> wrote: > > > But, can you tell use how you built your kernel and on what > > > system? COMPILER_TYPE should always be defined... Are you trying > > > to build a HEAD kernel on 9stable w/o using buildkernel or > > > something strange like that? > > > > With r255453 everything works as expected again. Thank you very > > much. > > It would still be helpful to know how you were building your kernel. Well, you're right. Usually, I try to explain everything I use in an unconevtional manner except compiler options. My systems are "purified", I use no crosscompiling. The problem has gone. Obviously, it was a fallout from a commit and I hit the missing piece when I was trying to recompile the kernel. > > If you were trying to build it on non-CURRENT, maybe we should add a > check to ensure that "COMPILER_TYPE" is defined and if not warn folks > their environment is not-supported. > As said, "vanilla" CURRENT, simply performing "make kernel" or "make buildkernel" on the machine the system is also running later - same architecture et cetera. Regards, Oliver
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:41 UTC