Typos and terseness brought to you by the LG G2 running SlimKat. On Feb 23, 2014 10:22 AM, "Lucius Rizzo" <Lucius.Rizzo_at_lucius.xxx> wrote: > > * Andreas Nilsson <andrnils_at_gmail.com> [2014-02-23 09:33]: > > Imho, the replacement to init and rc-scripts I sometimes think about > > would be to import SMF from opensolaris/illumos. There one can at > > least get the commands run and config used without looking at the > > source code. > > I like SMF from Solaris 11 onwards and even SmartOS. However, I have > found to like systemd and use via systemctl on Arch far nicer than any > other rc scripts to date. > > Anyone care to share their thoughts on the pros and cons of something > like systemd the way Arch does? The main developer for systemd is very anti-portability and anti-!Linux. He had actively rejected patches that made his projects work on non-Linux systems. In order to port systemd to a non-Linux system, he wants you to first implement every Linux feature that systemd uses. systemd is a non-starter, and not with considering. In theory, devd could be extended to support socket-activation, and the support for that added to RCng, providing the bulk of the systemd features, without having to deal with the systemd devs.Received on Sun Feb 23 2014 - 17:31:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC