The flow in both directions has to include: * better locking / parallelism * virtualised forwarding support (ie, vimage) If he's happy to include some stubs for that, then sure. I think both dfbsd and freebsd can use the same pf. -a On 26 July 2014 08:27, Mark Felder <feld_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > We've already heard of Henning offering to help port a new pf but the olive branch has been extended even further. He responded to some comments of mine on twitter: > > _at_HenningBrauer: _at_rhymebyter _at_feldpos I offered help/advice to whomever seriously attempts to update pf in _at_dragonflybsd AND _at_freebsd. > > _at_HenningBrauer: _at_feldpos it takes someone in freebsd/netbsd/dragonfly to update their ancient pf versions, then code can flow bidirectional > > Technical hurdles aside, that sounds like the beginning of an OpenPf to me... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Sat Jul 26 2014 - 15:46:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:51 UTC