On 19-11-2015 15:29, Dan Partelly wrote: >> Unlike what you suggest here, I see lots of issues in Bugzilla which >> exactly what you describe: enhancements on already available tools. >> I've even submitted a few myself. > > Thats great Willem. > > But no matter what you find odd or not, I am simply following what Ive read on some > page on freebsd.org that one of the ways of contributing is by submitting code > on the mailing-lists , where “somebody will happily pick up changes”. > > So, if you continue to find this odd, please take it up with the web-masters on > freebsd.org to update the resources regarding contributing to the project. I have to admit that you have read more of the freebsd.org website than that I have.... Most of the time I lurk on the lists here. Probably since the 1.0 incarnation of FreeBSD. And what I tried to explain, was that the bugtracker is used for more than just bugs. I've learnt that from several responses on the lists. I also saw that Justin picked up with a functional answers on your patch, so I'll go back into lurking mode. --WjW > > > >> On 19 Nov 2015, at 16:10, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw_at_digiware.nl> wrote: >> >> On 19-11-2015 14:53, Dan Partelly wrote: >>>> So not submitting a PR for an issue sound real strange to my ears. >>> >>> >>> It is NOT a patch for an issue, bug, anything on those lines at all. >>> It adds new features to DDB. Specifically it adds relational >>> operators. >>> >>> Since it doesn't solve any problems, I don't see why it should be added >>> to a problem database which is used for bug reports. >>> >> >> Unlike what you suggest here, I see lots of issues in Bugzilla which >> exactly what you describe: enhancements on already available tools. >> I've even submitted a few myself. >> >> An alternative for this might be submission to Phabricator if you'd like >> a more reviewing type of evaluation. >> >> --WjW >> >>> But then again, it may be just me. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 19 Nov 2015, at 15:44, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw_at_digiware.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 19-11-2015 10:57, Dan Partelly wrote: >>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot , mate. >>>>> >>>>> I’m reluctant to put it up as a PR, since some PR are outstanding for >>>>> years. >>>> >>>> What a strange argument.... >>>> >>>> Some PR's are fixed within hours/days.... >>>> Letting it linger in your mailbox after mental evaluation is not going >>>> to do anybody any good. >>>> >>>> As far as I understand is the PR database also the collective memory of >>>> things on/for/by/near/around the FreeBSD source code. People are >>>> explicitly asked to fill a PR so the issue at hand is not forgotten. >>>> >>>> So not submitting a PR for an issue sound real strange to my ears. >>>> >>>> But then again that's me. >>>> >>>> --WjW >>>> >>>> >>>>> Adrian, >>>>> >>>>> since Pedro has issue with hardware, could you try the patch and give >>>>> a resolution on it ? I reviewed it mentally (no FreeBSD atm machine >>>>> on which I could actually patch the kernel) and apart style changes >>>>> it looks OK . Physically i can test it again fro a couple of days. >>>>> Getting this reviewed & tested / committed or rejected would give me >>>>> an idea on how things actually work around here. This is actual code >>>>> which you can commit or reject not commentaries only like in the >>>>> thread regarding the binary code reuse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [qute from libxo thread ] >>>>>>> It's all fine and good making technical decisions based on >>>>>>> drawings and handwaving and philosophizing, but at some point >>>>>>> someone has to do the code. The reason is simple - someone >>>>>>> offered to do the work and push it through. This isn't a >>>>>>> commercial thing where we get to make project >>decisions and >>>>>>> allocate resources - the juniper folk came up with a solution >>>>>>> that >>>>> >>>>> Once I see how things work around here once someone wrote the code, >>>>> and get this done one way or another , we could proceed to the >>>>> libification of ifconfig, should you so desire, and you believe we >>>>> can all benefit from it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 19 Nov 2015, at 11:17, Pedro Giffuni <pfg_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello; >>>>>> >>>>>>> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly >>>>>>> <dan_partelly_at_rdsor.ro> ha scritto: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in which I added >>>>>>> relational ops support from it. The patch was a bit clobbered, >>>>>>> but last I know you cleaned it up and put it somewhere on >>>>>>> freebsd.org (prolly your page) up for review. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It’s here: https://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/ddb.patch >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven’t tested it though. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you or Adrian review the patch set , and if it is OK >>>>>>> potentially proceed with a commit ? Or if it is not ok for a >>>>>>> commit , please advice on a follow up. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am having hardware issues so I won’t be able to do much in a >>>>>> while. Perhaps you should review it and submit it as a PR. >>>>>> >>>>>> Pedro. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To >>>>> unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >>> >> >Received on Thu Nov 19 2015 - 15:04:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC