On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:46:03AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote: > On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber <gjb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that > > otherwise violates POLA? The commit recently was intended to revert > > a POLA violation, so maybe I am not entirely clear on what branch this > > affects. > > > > Are we talking about head or stable/10 here? > > > > Glen > > > > I am talking about head, which no longer installs/packages multiple kernels > by default. > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/Makefile.inc1?revision=299088&view=markup > > Whilst the r299088 commit is referring to a stable POLA violation, the > commit itself is a change to head with a proposed MFC after 3 days. Its > interesting, because this has surprised me when testing PkgBase on head, as > the behaviour has changed from the initial announcement. > I think there is a communication breakdown somewhere, then. But, I also realize we are talking about two different commits. (Which is why I CC'd glebius_at_ in the previous reply.) Since ngie_at_ already chimed in, I'll defer unless required to chime in. Glen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC