On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:23:55PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > > >I have no problems in building the traditional C "hello world" > >program with "cc -pedantic". > > You're right about that, you'll need a C++ hello world (<iostream>, cout). > This is in the archives anyway and (should be) well known. Yes, it is a well known issue. The user is getting exactly what they wanted when she gave -pedantic to g++. > >>(why could > >>this change not have been made _after_ 4.9 is out the door, btw.? Or > >>before 5.0-R FWIW.) > > > > > >4.9 and 5.0-R are independent branch. By your logic we should wait to > >4.10 or 4.11 or 4.12 or ... before any substantial change can be made > >to -CURRENT. > > The point is that is isn't wise to commit a change like the -pthread > deprecation that breaks many ports just before a ports-freeze. Which threads library should -pthread link to your app (libc_r, libkse, or libthr) on a 5.x system? > > >The reason gcc-3.3.1 was committed before 5.0-R should > >be fairly obvious. > > I was concerned with the -pthread deprecation. Why? The portmgr can tag the ports collection at any point in time before or after the -pthread deprecation date. Additionally, your initial email started with your whining about -pedantic a and "Hello world" programs, which is completely orthogonal to -pthread. -- SteveReceived on Wed Sep 10 2003 - 07:56:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:22 UTC