In message <20040713182351.GA72492_at_pit.databus.com>, Barney Wolff writes: >On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:05:45PM -0500, Jason Dusek wrote: >> >> I ran make world this morning. I ran make kernel as well, but the kernel is >> broken, so I kept my old kernel. Does this mean that I have a RELEASE >> kernel but a CURRENT world? Am I headed for trouble? > >To core: >How many users do we have to sabotage with "make world" before it gets >removed from the make targets? Is it really that hard in the very rare >case when "make buildworld && make installworld" is what's wanted to >type exactly that? And your argument here is that people are reciprocally less likely to hose (or as it may be: not hose) their systems because the have to type 27 characters more to do so ? Come again... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Tue Jul 13 2004 - 16:28:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC