In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111202000.87340-100000_at_InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju lian Elischer writes: > > >On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> >[...] >> mkdir /usr/src/nanobsd >[...] >> >> Feedback of all sorts most welcome! And more documentation >> to arrive as it gets written. > >wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD? >(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-) As I understand it picoBSD has never managed the 4.x->5.x transition and is scheduled to be removed if nobody starts paying attention to it soon. re_at_/scottl_at_ asked me to not put nanobsd in src/release as they would prefer it be kept for the "official release" stuff only, and to me src/tools actually makes a lot more sense after all. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:11:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:47 UTC