On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111202000.87340-100000_at_InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju > lian Elischer writes: > > > > > >On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > >> > >[...] > >> mkdir /usr/src/nanobsd > >[...] > >> > >> Feedback of all sorts most welcome! And more documentation > >> to arrive as it gets written. > > > >wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD? > >(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-) > > As I understand it picoBSD has never managed the 4.x->5.x transition > and is scheduled to be removed if nobody starts paying attention > to it soon. I may be looking at it soon as it still produces a smaller system than 'nanoBSD' and works well for systems with old 8MB flash. I've been using the 4.x version and may need a 5.x version 'soon'. > > re_at_/scottl_at_ asked me to not put nanobsd in src/release as they would > prefer it be kept for the "official release" stuff only, and to > me src/tools actually makes a lot more sense after all. hmmm then I guess picoBSD could probably move too. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >Received on Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:20:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:47 UTC