Re: "nanobsd" prototype

From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo_at_icir.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:45:23 -0800
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:10:54PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111202000.87340-100000_at_InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >>
> >[...] 
> >> 	mkdir /usr/src/nanobsd
> >[...]
> >> 
> >> Feedback of all sorts most welcome!  And more documentation
> >> to arrive as it gets written.
> >
> >wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD?
> >(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-)
> 
> As I understand it picoBSD has never managed the 4.x->5.x transition

what do you mean ? it builds happily last time i tried (sometime
in january) except for the usual bloat issues that the boot
floppies have too.

Now i agree that having picobsd in src/picobsd or src/tools
or even ports/sys/* would be a better place given that there are
absolutely no things to patch in the base tree except for the
following minor patch to /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 which i believe is
similar to the one you used for nanobsd

	cheers
	luigi
> lcvs diff -u Makefile.inc1 
Index: Makefile.inc1
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
retrieving revision 1.398
diff -u -r1.398 Makefile.inc1
--- Makefile.inc1       9 Dec 2003 00:42:44 -0000       1.398
+++ Makefile.inc1       6 Jan 2004 20:45:19 -0000
_at__at_ -372,7 +372,10 _at__at_
 .if !defined(SUBDIR_OVERRIDE)
 WMAKE_TGTS+=   _cross-tools
 .endif
-WMAKE_TGTS+=   _includes _libraries _depend everything
+WMAKE_TGTS+=   _includes _libraries
+.if !defined(PICOBSD)
+WMAKE_TGTS+=   _depend everything
+.endif
 
 buildworld: ${WMAKE_TGTS}
Received on Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:45:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:47 UTC