On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:10:54PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111202000.87340-100000_at_InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju > lian Elischer writes: > > > > > >On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > >> > >[...] > >> mkdir /usr/src/nanobsd > >[...] > >> > >> Feedback of all sorts most welcome! And more documentation > >> to arrive as it gets written. > > > >wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD? > >(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-) > > As I understand it picoBSD has never managed the 4.x->5.x transition what do you mean ? it builds happily last time i tried (sometime in january) except for the usual bloat issues that the boot floppies have too. Now i agree that having picobsd in src/picobsd or src/tools or even ports/sys/* would be a better place given that there are absolutely no things to patch in the base tree except for the following minor patch to /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 which i believe is similar to the one you used for nanobsd cheers luigi > lcvs diff -u Makefile.inc1 Index: Makefile.inc1 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v retrieving revision 1.398 diff -u -r1.398 Makefile.inc1 --- Makefile.inc1 9 Dec 2003 00:42:44 -0000 1.398 +++ Makefile.inc1 6 Jan 2004 20:45:19 -0000 _at__at_ -372,7 +372,10 _at__at_ .if !defined(SUBDIR_OVERRIDE) WMAKE_TGTS+= _cross-tools .endif -WMAKE_TGTS+= _includes _libraries _depend everything +WMAKE_TGTS+= _includes _libraries +.if !defined(PICOBSD) +WMAKE_TGTS+= _depend everything +.endif buildworld: ${WMAKE_TGTS}Received on Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:45:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:47 UTC