Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > On Saturday 25 September 2004 19:43, Nate Lawson wrote: > >>Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: >>When the BIOS gives an initial irq, we always try to route to that >>one first since some devices don't work at any other irq. > > > I marked the appropriate IRQ in the BIOS as "ISA/nonPnP", so the marked > IRQ *should* be assigned for the ISA card by the BIOS (but obviously > isn't). > > I hope I could clear the situation a bit. > > I sure can switch to 6-CURRENT or at least try the new acpi_pci_link.c, > but I don't believe that the problem is IRQ 9.... > > Thank you very much for your interest. I fear, these old ISA cards are > no longer of public interest... :-) I MFC'd the change to RELENG_5 as well so if you can test there or on 6-current, you should fine that the card works as before. The change was to allow the SCI (irq 9 on PIC systems) to always be used for devices, even if the ACPI _PRS setting for the device doesn't explicitly allow it. -NateReceived on Tue Nov 09 2004 - 04:32:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:21 UTC