Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 07:26 AM 11/21/2007, Barney Cordoba wrote: >> I've done a bit of research and it seems that this >> chipset has been ignored for years now by the FreeBSD >> team. Whats the reasoning for a major chipset used by > > I think you are jumping to conclusions. I have a HT1000 chipset board > and have been using it just fine for some time. > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-November/079920.html) > > There obviously are some cases were it does not, so its harder to > track down than just a case of spending $150. If you do have such a > board that does not work, perhaps make the offer of sending the > problem board to a developer who is interested in fixing the issue. That would be an excelent idea :) As usual I'll try to get any ATA/SATA HW that shows up on my doorstep working, thats the deal. I dont have the means nor the motivation to spend my own hard earned $$ on all kinds of HW to get someone out there free support, simple as that.. That said, I do have a HT1000 based board around a supermicro H8SSL that is used as a busy local fileserver, needless to say it works flawlessly. So, to get this worked on and hopefully fixed, get me a failing board to work on here... private mail with address details etc can be had on request... -SørenReceived on Mon Nov 26 2007 - 19:43:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:23 UTC