>> >> > Interestingly in my experience its been the opposite, I've lost a few > ext3 filesystems though bad power, same for NTFS (NT4, less so with > 200x) but as yet never for ufs2 (fsck has always fixed it.) In worse cases it required manual attention :) UFS is used and improved over 20 years, it's SIMPLE and practically bug-free now, except snapshots. I think it could be improved a bit more to support multiterabyte disks better. Like more blocks allowed per cylgroup and few other changes that will result in no more than 1000 cylgroups on that devices. This will improve fsck times a lot. Still it's well usable on 2TB disks.Received on Tue Jun 09 2009 - 15:38:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:49 UTC